Effect of metformin on bioactive lipid metabolism in insulin-resistant muscle

  1. Agnieszka U Blachnio-Zabielska2,3
  1. 1Department of Medical Biology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
  2. 2Department of Physiology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
  3. 3Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Metabolic Disorders, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
  4. 4Department of Perinatology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
  1. Correspondence should be addressed to A U Blachnio-Zabielska; Email: agnieszka.blachnio{at}umb.edu.pl
  1. Figure 1

    Mechanism of FFA-induced inhibition of insulin signaling. CD36, fatty acid translocase; FATP1, fatty acid transport protein 1; FABPpm, fatty acid-binding protein (plasma membrane); ACS, acyl-coenzyme A synthetase; LCACoA, long-chain acyl-CoAs; LCAC, long-chain acyl-carnitines; SPT, serine palmitoyltransferase; PPA2, protein phosphatase A2; PAP1/PAP2, phosphatidate phosphatase, isoforms 1 and 2; Akt/PKB, protein kinase B; DAG, diacylglycerol; PKC, protein kinase C; IR, insulin receptor; IRS1, insulin receptor substrate 1; GLUT4, glucotransporter 4; AS160, Akt substrate 160; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; aPKC, atypical protein kinase C; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; AMPK, AMP-activated kinase; CPT1, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1. *Denotes lipids with measured concentration and FSR.

  2. Figure 2

    Metformin treatment improves glucose and insulin tolerance and muscle insulin signaling in HFD animals. Panels A and C – plasma glucose during OGTT and IPTT tests respectively. Panels B and D – plasma glucose area under curve (AUC) for OGTT and IPTT tests, respectively. Panel E and F – Akt/PKB phosphotylation at serine 473 and theonine 308, respectively; G and H – AS160 phosphorylation and GLUT4 expression, respectively. Values are mean ± s.d. (n = 8 for each group), P < 0.05 against: a- vs C; *- vs HFD.

  3. Figure 3

    The effect of metformin on intracellular uptake and acyl-CoA conversion of fatty acids in in skeletal muscle of HFD-fed animals. Panel A – plasma FFA; B, C – protein and mRNA expression of Cd36, Fatp1 and Fabp pm. D – muscle acyl-CoA content; E and F – protein expression and enzymatic activity of ACS. Values are mean ± s.d. (n = 8 for each group), P < 0.05 against: a- vs C; *- vs HFD.

  4. Figure 4

    Metformin promotes mitochondrial channeling of fatty acids in skeletal muscle of HFD-fed animals. Panel A and B – total long-chain acyl-carnitine (LCAC) content and FSR; Panel C and D – mRNA and protein expression of CPT1. Panel E – 16:0-AC to 16:0-CoA ratio (a measure of mitochondrial fatty acids uptake); Panel F – malonyl-CoA content; Panels G and H – mRNA expression and protein phosphorylation of ACC. Values are mean ± s.d. (n = 8 for each group), P < 0.05 against: a- vs C; *- vs HFD.

  5. Figure 5

    Metformin inhibits synthesis of Cer and DAG in skeletal muscle of HFD-fed animals. Panels A and B – total ceramide content and C16:0-Cer FSR; Panels C and D mRNA and protein expression of SPT; Panels E and F – total DAG content 16:0/16:0-DAG FSR; Panels G and H – phosphatidic acid phosphatase 2 (PAP2) activity and protein expression. Values are mean ± s.d. (n = 8 for each group), P < 0.05 against: a- vs C; *- vs HFD.

  6. Figure 6

    Principal component analysis (PCA) reveals association of 18-carbon acyl-chain length Cer and DAG with insulin resistance measures in HFD-fed animals. Panel A – scores scatter plot for 1st and 2nd PCA components. Arrows and names indicate direction and type and of major variables responsible for group differences. Panel B – loadings scatter plot for 2 first PCA components. The variables grouped in 3 major clusters (encircled) are described in ‘Results’ section.

| Table of Contents