Figure 1
High-power view through a dissecting microscope of the hypophysial portal vessels on the anterior surface of the pituitary
stalk (left) of an anesthetised rat. The portal vessels (veins) arise from the primary capillary bed on the median eminence
(pink area to the left) and fan out over the anterior pituitary gland (right) at the pituitary stalk junction to the right.
The tubero-infundibular artery, a branch of the superior hypophysial artery, can be seen arching across the top of the stalk–pituitary
junction, where it enters the anterior pituitary gland. This artery passes through the anterior pituitary gland to supply
arterial blood to the neurohypophysis. Reproduced from Handbook of Neuroendocrinology, Fink G, Neural control of the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland (pars distalis), pp 97–138, copyright (2012), with permission
from Elsevier. Note: The contentious history of the discovery and function of the hypophysial portal vessels is detailed in
chapter 2 of Harris' (1955) monograph, to which the interested reader is referred. Popa & Fielding (1930, 1933), who first
discovered the hypophysial portal system, posited that the direction of blood flow was centripetal: that is, from the anterior
pituitary gland towards the hypothalamus. The direction of portal vessel blood flow (centrifugally from the hypothalamus to
the anterior pituitary gland) was ultimately resolved by microscopic visualisation of the vessels in the living anaesthetised
rat (Green & Harris 1949). In fact, Nobel Laureate (1947) Bernado Houssay and his team had reported the centrifugal direction
of portal vessel blood flow in the living toad (Houssay et al. 1935), but because their publication was in French, it was ignored until the late 1940s. The functional importance of the
hypophysial portal vessels involved Harris in a conflict with the influential Sir Solly Zuckerman, who, on the basis of studies
in the ferret, challenged the neurohumoral hypothesis of anterior pituitary control. The debate between Zuckerman and Harris
was the subject of letters to Nature (Thomson & Zuckerman 1953, Donovan & Harris 1954). Before publishing his 1954 reply to Zuckerman, Harris submitted a draft
of his letter to the regents of the Maudsley Hospital. After several months, the regents gave Harris permission to publish,
but they cautioned him that if he did so, he would 'have a powerful enemy for life' (Geoffrey Harris, 1971, personal communication).