Effects of exercise on gut peptides, energy intake and appetite

  1. Catia Martins,
  2. Linda M Morgan,
  3. Stephen R Bloom1 and
  4. M Denise Robertson
  1. School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
  2. 1Department of Metabolic Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London W12 ONN, UK
  1. (Requests for offprints should be addressed to M D Robertson; Email: m.robertson{at}surrey.ac.uk)
  1. Figure 1

    (a) Haemoglobin levels (mg/dl) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (♦) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant main effects of time, condition or time × condition interaction. (b) Hematocrit (%) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (♦) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant main effects of time, condition or time × condition interaction.

  2. Figure 2

    (a) Plasma NEFA concentrations (mmol/l) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (⋄) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant main effects of time or condition but a significant time × condition interaction (P < 0.0001). (b) Plasma TAG concentrations (mmol/l) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (⋄) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant main effects of time or condition but a significant time × condition interaction (P = 0.011). (c) Plasma glucose concentrations (mmol/l) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (⋄) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time (P < 0.0001), but no significant effect of condition or condition × time interaction.

  3. Figure 4

    VAS scores for hunger over time during the exercise (▪) and control (⋄) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time (P < 0.0001) and a condition × time interaction (P = 0.004).

  4. Figure 3

    (a) Plasma PYY concentrations (pmol/L) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (⋄) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time (P < 0.0001) and a significant condition × time interaction (P = 0.038). (b) Plasma GLP-1 concentrations (pmol/l) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (⋄) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time (P < 0.0001), condition (P = 0.011) and condition × time interaction (P = 0.001). (c) Plasma PP concentrations (pmol/l) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (⋄) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time (P < 0.0001), condition (P = 0.001) and a condition × time interaction (P < 0.0001). (d) Plasma ghrelin concentrations (pmol/l) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (⋄) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time (P < 0.0001), but no effect of condition or time × condition interaction. (e) Plasma insulin concentrations (pmol/l) over time, 1 h after a 500 kcal breakfast, during the exercise (▪) and control (⋄) trials. Values represent means ± s.e.m. for 12 subjects. Repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant effect of time, and a trend towards a significant effects of condition (P = 0.066) and time × condition interaction (P = 0.069).

| Table of Contents