Occurrence of second primary malignancies in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive tract and pancreas

    1. Wouter W de Herder
    1. Department of Internal Medicine, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, S‐Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
      1Comprehensive Cancer Centre Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    1. (Correspondence should be addressed to W W de Herder; Email: w.w.deherder{at}erasmusmc.nl)

    Abstract

    An increased association between neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas (GEP-NET) and other second primary malignancies has been suggested. We determined whether there is indeed an increased risk for second primary malignancies in GEP-NET patients compared with an age- and sex-matched control group of patients with identical malignancies. The series comprised 243 men and 216 women, diagnosed with a GEP-NET between 2000 and 2009 in a tertiary referral center. The timeline, before-at-after diagnosis, and the type of other malignancies were studied using person-year methodology. Poisson distributions were used for testing statistical significance. All data were cross-checked with the Dutch National Cancer Registry. Out of 459 patients with GEP-NET, 67 (13.7%) had a second primary cancer diagnosis: 25 previous cancers (5.4%), 13 synchronous cancers (2.8%), and 29 metachronous cancers (6.3%). The most common types of second primary cancer were breast cancer (n=10), colorectal cancer (n=8), melanoma (n=6), and prostate cancer (n=5). The number of patients with a cancer history was lower than expected, although not significant (n=25 vs n=34.5). The diagnosis of synchronous cancers, mainly colorectal tumors, was higher than expected (n=13 vs n=6.1, P<0.05). Metachronous tumors occurred as frequent as expected (n=29 vs n=25.2, NS). In conclusion, our results are in contrast to previous studies and demonstrate that only the occurrence of synchronous second primary malignancies, mainly colorectal cancers, is increased in GEP-NET patients compared with the general population.

    • Revision received 7 December 2011
    • Accepted 22 December 2011
    • Made available online as an Accepted Preprint 22 December 2011
    | Table of Contents