ERC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Endocrine-Related Cancer 15 (1) 27 -36     DOI: 10.1677/ERC-07-0249
Copyright © 2008 by the Society for Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ponzone, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sismondi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ponzone, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sismondi, P.

Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: different structures, same effects?

Riccardo Ponzone, Paola Mininanni, Elisa Cassina, Francesca Pastorino and Piero Sismondi

Gynaecological Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC) and ASO Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, Turin 10060, Italy

(Correspondence should be addressed to R Ponzone; Email: rponzone{at}mauriziano.it) (riccardo.ponzone{at}tin.it)

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have become the first-choice endocrine drugs for postmenopausal breast cancer patients since they are associated with superior activity and better general tolerability when compared with tamoxifen both in the adjuvant and metastatic settings. As a consequence, the question is no more if a postmenopausal patient should have AIs as part of her adjuvant treatment, but when should it be started or which one should be preferentially used. Newer compounds, generally defined as third-generation AIs, are biochemically more selective and potent when compared with older ones, and they also show superior clinical activity. As yet, no large randomised study has been published comparing the three third-generation AIs on the market. Nevertheless, both laboratory and clinical data suggest that the steroidal (exemestane) and non-steroidal (anastrozole, letrozole) AIs may have slightly different toxicity profiles, probably due to the low androgenic action of the formers. While waiting for randomised data on clinical efficacy of third-generation AIs, such differences may help select the best drug in elderly patients with a low cumulative risk of relapse and a significant amount of co-morbidities, such as cardiovascular disease or osteoporosis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
J. A. Files, M. G. Ko, and S. Pruthi
Managing Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Survivors: Not Just for Oncologists
Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2010; 85(6): 560 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society for Endocrinology.